Rama in a trap of questions unanswered
Instead of entering
The Extraordinary Congress of the SP, the Socialists and not only they, waiting to hear from Rama a full analysis of the causes and reasons why the Socialist Party on 28 June was not as votëbesua governing party. The explanation given by Rama was not only due, but instead to clarify the causes of the loss of even more mjegulloi the truth why SP did not come to power. To say that we won, but our victory was stolen by corrupt state machines Berisha, have not told all the truth. The truth is the other side of the coin: the opposition’s responsibility to protect citizens vote every time that matches it faces electoral anti-democratic regimes like that of Berisha. Mjegullnaja in Rama’s explanation resembles more and more as an alibi to keep his seat with head bent and identify voices against the SP as a service, not against the truth, but as a service to Berisha. This alibi feels more and more narrow face numerous questions of the public.
SP loss without charge and without answer questions from Rama
In Congress Edi Rama spoke strongly worded pre-election electoral crime that was prepared by cars day after day mafia state of Sali Berisha, as one of the causes of the theft of the Socialist Party victory. So that is why there Edi Rama denounced this crime daily pre election? Instead Albanians remember that day for day Rama guarantee them at any meeting of their electoral votes for the SP-in was guaranteed.
In Congress Edi Rama spoke equally strongly for electoral crime occurred on the day of voting, as a theft because another victory of the Socialist Party. So that is why on election day from the headquarters of the SP and its headquarters in 12 electoral districts, Edi Rama and his campaign spokesman said the situation is calm for the election? Electronic media is forwarded to live these statements. At least all remember how optimistic the election day in the media Rama said after the close of the voting process, where not forget to thank not only citizens, but also the State Police to progress the process. Only later, when the results of vote counting does not speak for plebiscite victory of the Socialist Party, Edi Rama, as expected, he changed in the opposite his appreciation for this process.
Edi Rama spoke in Congress for electoral masquerade, although records of election results are certified signed by all representatives of the SP. How can that the minutes of the final results of 12 counties have received votes in favor of SP representatives in the CEC? While until now, no question the moral and professional integrity and political commissioner no socialist at all levels.
In Congress Edi Rama stressed that on June 28th rape of people from cars will corrupt mafia and clan Berisha was incomparable with all previous elections. Even this violation can not be compared even with electoral crime 26 May 1996. Then why international observers declared on 29 June, in their preliminary report, that “election day was generally calm and peaceful and the atmosphere was improved? Meanwhile remember that on 27 May 1996, a day after the elections, international observers said in their press conference that the elections were seriously violated by the Berisha government.
In Congress, a report was published in documentary form for the theft of voting by Sali Berisha, prepared by the administration of SPA. Why this report was published two months after the election, exactly the day when Edi Rama urged a new mandate 4-year-old? If the violations identified in this report would be made public in denouncing the moment when they happened, then many of these violations would not have affected the outcome of the vote.
In Congress, said Edi Rama, the result of the June 28 elections will not be recognized any time by the Socialist Party because they had been outside any democratic standard, where votes were dhunua free as never before in years of pluralism. How is it that immediately after this statement, Olli Rehn, Commissioner for EU enlargement, said on 2 September in Brussels that “recently held elections in Albania were better than in years past, however, still had shortcomings “? To think that the EU Commissioner has no relevant information to what really happened in Albania on 28 June, while we monitorohemi intensively from Brussels official, is total nonsense.
Edi Rama in Congress strongly insisted in his speech that the theft of the vote has been massive and spread across the country. Only a week later, the Coalition of Domestic Observers (KVV), a voluntary union of six civil society organizations including local observers in 2500, published in Tirana final monitoring report of June 28 elections. In this report the 28 June parliamentary elections evaluated as a positive contribution and achievement for democracy. How can that 2500 observers, who monitored the vote count 100 countries and 20 rural areas have found that Rama says, but have found violations and irregularities that are repeated almost equally in all elections, whether parliamentary or local?
In Congress Edi Rama stressed that: “… in this party there are people who think that elections organized by Sali Berisha, was incompatible with democratic standards necessary to freedom and fairness in granting suffrage and its count …” Why Edi Rama fabrikon such false, while never, in any case, no representative of the SP has stated that the elections meet June 28 recognized democratic standards. Voices critical of Edi Rama criticize him why not documented and not in time to prevent the violation of democratic standards in the granting of voting and its count. Remember that the 14 electoral Showdown with Berisha’s Socialist Party has won nine of them. SP has won nine times in front Berisha, although protection of voting in most cases there were many times more difficult than protecting the vote on 28 June, especially in the first time opposition 1992-1997.
Instead of conclusion
The congress Edi Rama, in violation of the statute of SPA, which interrupts the President’s mandate when it lost the general legislative elections, called his rikandidimin not a controversial option, but an indisputable obligation! How can that four years ago, when the Socialist Party lost elections July 3, Edi Rama asked with insistence Fatos Nano’s departure from the direction of SP, (even though that once the statute of SP was not sanctioned the suspension of the mandate in case loss legislative elections), but today he not only refuses to stop his two-year mandate, but also requires a four-year term? According to Rama of four years ago: “… in terms of political moral victory is all, and the loss is only the first among equals, who takes on the shoulder the moral responsibility on behalf of all ….” But Edi Rama today refuses to resign, choosing to behave as an ordinary politician most backward part of the Balkan trevës, turning away the old Rama and Berisha approaching we know all.